aiaimodel.cards
← All benchmarks

BrowseComp

We haven't written a description for this benchmark yet; see the card notes below for how each maker ran it.

  1. 1Claude Opus 5 · Anthropic
    90.8%
  2. 2Gemini 3.1 Pro · Google
    85.9%

How each maker reported it

  • Claude Opus 5 Table 8.1.A, p.148–149

    Claude Opus 5 results use adaptive thinking at max effort, averaged over five trials (ARC-AGI-3 at high effort). GPT-5.6 Sol's FrontierBench figure uses Codex and its ARC-AGI-1 figure is at xhigh. The Fable 5 HealthBench Professional figure carries a footnote reading "Mythos 5". Competitor figures come from the developers' own published results or leaderboards.

  • Gemini 3.1 Pro p.4

    Results as of February 2026, Gemini at Thinking (High); competitors at their highest reported settings, as listed by Google.

Only each model's own maker's number is shown; scores a maker reports for rival models are left out.