aiaimodel.cards
← All benchmarks

GPQA Diamond

Graduate-level science multiple-choice questions written to be hard to look up.

  1. 1Gemini 3.1 Pro · Google
    94.3%
  2. 2DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · DeepSeek
    90.9%
  3. 3Gemma 4 31B · Google
    84.3%
  4. 4Mistral Small 4 · Mistral AI
    71.2%
  5. 5Llama 4 Maverick · Meta
    69.8%
  6. 6Llama 4 Scout · Meta
    57.2%

How each maker reported it

  • Gemini 3.1 Pro p.4

    Results as of February 2026, Gemini at Thinking (High); competitors at their highest reported settings, as listed by Google.

  • DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Table 3, p.33

    All models at max reasoning effort. Code-agent benchmarks use DeepSeek Harness Minimal mode with 1M context; DeepSWE uses mini-SWE; visual agent tasks use the Claude Code harness with 512K context. HLE for some models is the text-only subset. The Hugging Face card lists NL2Repo-Bench as 64.0; the report and change log say 65.4.

  • Gemma 4 31B Benchmark results

    Instruction-tuned models, as published in Google's model card. OmniDocBench is edit distance (lower is better). Audio benchmarks are omitted because 31B has no audio input.

  • Mistral Small 4 HF model card, launch post

    Vendor-reported. With reasoning, Mistral says it matches or beats GPT-OSS 120B on AA LCR, LiveCodeBench and AIME25 with shorter outputs; those comparisons are charts without numbers.

  • Llama 4 Maverick Benchmarks: Instruction tuned models

    Meta's own 0-shot results on bf16 weights. Llama 3.x models have no image support and a 128K context, so those cells are not reported.

  • Llama 4 Scout Benchmarks: Instruction tuned models

    Meta's own 0-shot results on bf16 weights. Llama 3.x models have no image support and a 128K context, so those cells are not reported.

Only each model's own maker's number is shown; scores a maker reports for rival models are left out.